The Difference Between Vandalism and Terrorism

It’s a curious time we’re living in when the FBI investigates vandalism against Tesla vehicles and floats the idea that such incidents might constitute terrorism. Why? Because I’ve yet to see acts of vandalism against private property placed on the same level as an outright attack on the very foundation of democracy—the U.S. Capitol. And frankly, equating the two is more than disingenuous; it’s dangerous.

To be clear, I don't condone vandalism, whether it’s against Tesla vehicles or any other property. Damaging cars or businesses only inflames tensions and solves absolutely nothing. The individuals who go out and target Teslas might be angry at Elon Musk's actions or the politics he’s aligned himself with, but their actions are misguided and counterproductive.

However, calling such acts of vandalism “terrorism” is where I personally draw the line. Breaking a window or keying a car is not—and should never be considered—the same as storming the Capitol, an institution that represents democracy. The Capitol attack was an insurrection born out of lies about a “stolen” election, an attempt to undermine the electoral process itself. Compare that to vandalizing Teslas because of anger toward Musk—whether it’s about his political statements, his policies at companies, or even personal grievances like losing a job—and the distinction should be glaringly obvious.

The Capitol Attack vs. Vandalizing Private Property

The storming of the Capitol was a stark assault on democracy itself, involving violence, threats, and even loss of life. It was an organized movement fueled by disinformation, seeking to overturn the will of the people as decided through a legitimate election. It was an attack that jeopardized national security, lawmakers, and the rule of law.

Now, contrast that with vandalizing a Tesla vehicle or even a showroom. Is it illegal? Yes. Is it destructive? Of course. But terrorism? Hardly. Making that leap waters down what terrorism really is, creating a false equivalency that diminishes larger, graver threats to society. When you elevate property damage to the level of terrorism, it distorts priorities and reveals a troubling narrative.